On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Tom Prado wrote:
> Jerome De Greef wrote:
> >Did you succeed applying this patch? It tries to completely remove the
> >content of fs/filesystems.c.
> >The 2.4.0 patch was adding a few line to this file.
> I've created a 2.4.10 patch for imon. The patch is available at
> http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86 It is also available
> at http://webpages.charter.net/tprado
> Please ignore the 2.4.7 patch I submitted for imon. It's defective in
> that it destroys fs/filesystems.c. I've confirmed that the 2.4.10 patch
> is okay in this respect.
> I've tested the 2.4.10 patch against my local machine as well as a NFS
> connected machine. I've only tested it when it's compiled as a module.
> Please note that I am in no way affiliated with SGI and I hack on my own
> free time.
Why do people continue to work on the imon patch? In what way do you think
the current Linux directory notification is inadequate? (Except being a
horrible interface, but that is all hidden by fam.)
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe fam | mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx