netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented
From: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:53:50 +0100
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0112091642480.6079-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from hadi@xxxxxxxxxx on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 04:45:01PM -0500
Mail-followup-to: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200112091814.VAA00499@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0112091642480.6079-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 04:45:01PM -0500, jamal wrote:
> > > Cant think of a straight way to do this .... Alexey would know,
> >
> > SO_PRIORITY. Or I did not follow you?
> 
> So priority limits the size of skb->priority to be from 0..6; this wont
> work with that check in cbq.

No, only IP_TOS does so.

Regards,

bert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
Trilab                                 The Technology People
Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl           - Nerd Available -
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>