[Top] [All Lists]

Re: suggestion for routing code improvement

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: suggestion for routing code improvement
From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:05:19 +0200
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204111813500.5560-100000@l>
References: <15541.41833.773161.740744@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204111813500.5560-100000@l>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Julian Anastasov writes:
 > >  Interesting. At what rate of new connections/s did you test?
 >      It was on 100mbit, I already don't remember the exact tests
 > and number of clients, etc. The patch is archived ..., here it is.
 > You can try it yourself:

 >      Sorry that it does not have flood rate limits, use QoS in
 > the flooding host :) You can try the patch with different tools,
 > of course.

 Very intesting. Well seems like I don't get out of the lab until the
 snow comes....
 We're testing GIGE switches now. With one Linux box with five e1000
 we can put a background load of almost 5 Gbit/s into the switch.
 And check latencies through other pair of switch ports. 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>