|Subject:||Re: VLAN patches|
|From:||"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 07 Oct 2002 00:06:27 -0700 (PDT)|
|Cc:||greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn.Andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|References:||<20021006.194654.35505461.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3DA1010A.8020202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DA13332.4080109@xxxxxxx>|
From: Eran Mann <emann@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 09:09:38 +0200 Regarding the 0 VID it is indeed used for priority-only frames. Shouldn't it be supported by alowing the user to configure a priority map for the ethernet device (rather than creating another user-visible device? I don't have any opinion about this, besides the fact that if the device based interface we have now can do whatever the user wants we should not add a new configuration mechanism just to provide some alias that effectively accomplishes the same task.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|