netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses

To: dfawcus@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20021010002902.A3803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20021009234421.J29133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021009.161414.63434223.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20021010002902.A3803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@xxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:29:02 +0100

   There are areas where the TAHI tests expect a certain behaviour
   when more than one behaviour is acceptable.

Great, that's what I was trying to find out.

Now I just need to know if this link-local prefix case
is one such issue. :-)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>