[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes]

To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Lunz <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes]
From: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:47:55 -0800
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> A better approximation I think but probably not the last...

Thanks for you help guys!  I broke NAPI (don't hate me) and then went on
vacation, so I apologize for not responding sooner.  I like what you've
come up with here, so I'll turn the patch around for Jeff to update 2.5

> +       e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter);
> +       e1000_clean_rx_irq(adapter, &work_done, work_to_do);

Just curious, why give priority to Tx over Rx?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>