[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:20:34 +0900 (JST)
Cc: toml@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030401.200225.88014087.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20030401.193429.64279267.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030402.130232.78951283.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030401.200225.88014087.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20030401.200225.88014087.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 01 Apr 2003 
20:02:25 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> I just checked, nobody cares about the 8 bytes in enc_data.
> Therefore, I think you're idea of enc_data[0] is the best.
> Someone please double check my claims and submit a patch. :-)

Okay, I'll check it (and make a patch) in this afternoon 
(in a few hours).

Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>