netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics
From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:04:43 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Alex Aizman <itn780@xxxxxxxxx>, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'jamal'" <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dmitry Yusupov'" <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, "'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, "'netdev'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050331185954.GR24804@xxxxxx>
References: <20050330161522.GH32111@xxxxxxxxx> <20050331114122.GL24804@xxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503310711430.21935@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050331185954.GR24804@xxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

> I was talking about the hardware limits for early filtering,
> not the size of the mempools.

That should not be an issue, since packets in those
buffers don't stick around, but can be throw away
at will.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>