[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Route cache performance

To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Route cache performance
From: Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:28:23 -0700
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <17191.55685.861191.831981@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050825200543.GA6612@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050825212211.GA23384@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050826115520.GA12351@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17167.29239.469711.847951@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050906235700.GA31820@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17182.64751.340488.996748@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050907162854.GB24735@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050907195911.GA8382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050913221448.GD15704@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17191.55685.861191.831981@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:04:21AM +0200, Robert Olsson wrote:

> Simon Kirby writes:
>  > Sender: 367 Mbps, 717883 pps valid src/dst, 64 byte (Ethernet) packets
>  > 
>  > 2.4.27-rc1: 297 Mbps forwarded (w/idle time?!)
>  > 2.4.31: 296 Mbps forwarded (w/idle time?!)
>  > 2.6.13-rc6: 173 Mbps forwarded
>  > Time permitting, I'd also like to run some profiles.  It's interesting
>  > to note that 2.6 is slower at forwarding even straight duplicate small
>  > packets.  We should definitely get to the bottom of that.
>  Yes. This is single flow? Strange.
>  Run a fixed size shot 10Mpkts pkts or so for both 2.4 and 2.6 and save 
>  /proc/interrupts, proc/net/softnetstat, netstat -i, tc -s qdisc to start 
> with.

I got stuck in some mud again, but I was able to run a small oprofile.

nf_iterate was near the top even though the firewall was empty, so I
load it).  Throughput went up from 173 Mbps to 232 Mbps...yikes. 
Conntrack was never compiled.  I'll do some more profiling when I get
a chance...


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>