xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available!

To: Christoph Hellwig <chhellwig@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available!
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:05:21 -0500
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004010841490.4727-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200004011416.IAA31320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20000401171800.A3460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Neither the patch file nor the snapshot will be generated on a regular basis.
The CVS stuff will be needed to keep up with the current state of the tree.

I'm not sure why you would want to read the patch file any ways, it's quite
large.

> On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 08:16:15AM -0600, Jim Mostek wrote:
> > >> and expensive 56k or 64k lines. I can download reiserfs, ext3, jfs and 
> > >> linlogfs either as patch or
> > >> as tarball of the new files, why can't you do this, too?
> > >
> > >Please do :(
> >
> > Russell placed a smaller source patch in:
> > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ftpdir/03312000linux-2.3.99pre2-linux-2.3-xfs.patch.gz
>
> Ok, I've downloaded it. BTW: the patch has all the CVS dirs included, so it 
> is not very well
> readable. Could you please remove this in the next version?
>
> >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>