xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: libxfs.h and the xfsprogs-devel package? <- Er, clarification ...

To: Thomas Graichen <thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: libxfs.h and the xfsprogs-devel package? <- Er, clarification ...
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:20:34 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: SmithConcepts/Personal
References: <3A947AA9.F12C2572@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A947A20.6E79C8BF@xxxxxxx> <3A98B6FE.1E056F6B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-97afe0$52i$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3A9948DB.993500E2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <news2mail-97bgbh$on6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx, thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: libxfs.h and the xfsprogs-devel package? <- Er, clarification
...

Thomas Graichen wrote:
> i am always using the cvs tree (or better my checked out copy of it
> :-) ... the xfsprogs-devel rpm you get by going into the cmd/xfsprogs
> dir and running "Makepgks verbose" (the same for the other rpms and
> dirs)

No, I'm familiar with that.  I already built:

   acl-1.0.1-0.i386.rpm
   acl-devel-1.0.1-0.i386.rpm
   attr-1.0.1-0.i386.rpm
   attr-devel-1.0.1-0.i386.rpm
   dmapi-0.1.1-0.i386.rpm
   dmapi-devel-0.1.1-0.i386.rpm
   xfsdump-1.0.2-0.i386.rpm
   xfsprogs-1.1.2-0.i386.rpm
   xfsprogs-devel-1.1.2-0.i386.rpm

What I was talking about was building _unified_ RPM akin to
"xfs-cmds-1.0.5-1.i386.rpm" like in Pre-Release 0.9.  That way I
don't have to modify Anaconda to know that all those RPMs replace
that one.

As such, I just suggested putting a .spec file in the "cmd" CVS root
so you can.  I tried merging spec/makefiles in an attempt to create
a new "xfs-cmds-*.i386.rpm" to no avail.

-- TheBS
  
-- 
Bryan "TheBS" Smith, Engineer                  CONTACT INFO
***********************************************************
 Chat: thebs413 @ AOL/MSN/Yahoo (see http://Everybuddy.com)
Email: mailto:thebs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>