xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patch for patch

To: <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patch for patch
From: Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:57:25 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3B2112F5.5450D65@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3B2112F5.5450D65@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Alan Eldridge wrote:
> 
>> The fs/Config.in patch is missing the default. Fixed:
> 
> Hmm what?
> its there.

>>  CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE $CONFIG_UFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
>> +
>> +tristate 'Page Buffer support' CONFIG_PAGE_BUF y
                   I had to add this "y" **********^

to the patch file. The kernel rpm would not (auto-)configure without it.
The RPM's configure invocation bombed out because there was no default set 
for CONFIG_PAGE_BUF.

[alane@wwweasel alane]$ ls -l RH*
-rw-r--r--    1 alane    alane      120238 Jun  8 02:26 RHlinux-2.4.5-core-
xfs-06082001.patch
-rw-r--r--    1 alane    alane      120239 Jun  8 16:46 RHlinux-2.4.5-core-
xfs-06082001.patch.new
[alane@wwweasel alane]$ diff -w RH*
2489c2489
< +tristate 'Page Buffer support' CONFIG_PAGE_BUF
---
> +tristate 'Page Buffer support' CONFIG_PAGE_BUF y
[alane@wwweasel alane]$





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>