Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> At 08:23 AM 7/14/2001 -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> >Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> > > maybe i'm stupid, but i'm seeing really odd things with both tools
> > > (getting
> > > development trees):
> > >
> > > cvs: it gets a complete linux tree, but there is no top-level makefile.
> > > it
> > > isn't clear to me what to do, at that point.
> > >
> > > cvsup: it gets a complete tree, but there are all kinds of revision
> > files (the
> > > ',v' suffixes), and attempts to build get weird errors from make.
> >The ,v files are RCS files.
> >Make sure you have the "tag=." field in your sup file if you want
> >the the actuall files.
> i guess i was confused by the webpage directions. it (cvsup howto) said that
> if you want to track the development tree, remove the 'tag=.' from the cvsup
Are you looking at this page?
to keep your cvs tree current drop the tag=.