"D. Stimits" wrote:
> Alistair Lambie wrote:
> > On 05 Jul 2001 17:42:01 -0500, cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Nathan Straz wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:15:26PM -0600, D. Stimits wrote:
> > > > > Being that the ISO images are rather large, it might be nice to have a
> > > > > duplicate of each current ISO available that is the gzip version.
> > > >
> > > > Here's an old FTP trick, append a .gz to any filename on an FTP site and
> > > > the FTP server will gzip it for you.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Good idea (I'll check to make sure oss is configed to do this)
> > > but I doubt this will save space,
> > > every file on the iso is already compressed.
> > > So about the only space to be gained would be in
> > > the cd9660 file system, which I very small to start with.
> > >
> > I thought it wouldn't save much either, but I just did it on
> > RH7.1-SGI-XFS-1.0.iso and it went from 299MB to 221MB.
> > --
> > Alistair Lambie alambie@xxxxxxx
> > SGI Global Product Support Phone: +64-21-635 262
> > New Zealand Fax: +64-4-234 8792
> The machine I hope to start the download on tonight receives at 26.4
> kbps. Hmm. 78 MB might help :P
> The .gz notes show it runs max compression, so I'll use that if a gzip
> -9 isn't available. It would still be quite useful to have a
> precompressed image, since the cpu load to do a -9 compression is
> "significant", and a one-time compression is probably the better
I just realized how poorly this last paragraph was written. To clarify,
if the iso with .gz extension is not already available, I'll try adding
it to get the server to do on-the-fly compression. But the compression
itself is not trivial with 300 MB, so it would be better to have a
precompressed image if possible.
> D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx