xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks

To: Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks
From: Ragnar Kjørstad <reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 02:57:25 +0200
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3B507259.4436853E@baldauf.org>; from Xuan Baldauf on Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 06:24:57PM +0200
References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10107141752080.18419-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl> <3B507259.4436853E@baldauf.org>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 06:24:57PM +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote:
> > > I do not use XFS, currently. Why is XFS better for Samba?
> >
> > Because word documents average 0.1 - 1MB.
> 
> Ah. So you just mean speed (quantity), not some features (quality)-

Also XFS supports ACLs, that may be a important feature for some
windows-users.


-- 
Ragnar Kjorstad
Big Storage


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>