xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Logdev size?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Logdev size?
From: Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 09:36:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <20010724102533.F31186@dkp.com>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200107241402.f6OE2qD24056@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20010724102533.F31186@dkp.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:25:33AM -0400, Andrew Klaassen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:02:52AM -0500, 
> Steve Lord wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, 1.0.1 is probably good enough come to think of it, but I
> > would probably go with the latest cvs kernel given the
> > highmem/raid deadlocks which have been fixed post 1.0.1.
> 
> Hmm.
> 
> That makes me nervous; there isn't a tagged-and-tested CVS
> kernel, is there?

Nope, especially not on a 1TB IDE RAID5.  

-- 
Nate Straz                                              nstraz@xxxxxxx
sgi, inc                                           http://www.sgi.com/
Linux Test Project                                  http://ltp.sf.net/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>