[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Logdev size?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Logdev size?
From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:12:29 -0400
In-reply-to: <3B603846.5B6A6980@sgi.com>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200107241352.f6ODqZJ23995@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20010725205259.C2291@dkp.com> <3B603846.5B6A6980@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:33:26AM -0500, 
Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Andrew Klaassen wrote:

> > Hmmm.
> > 
> >   size 16384b specified for log subvolume is too large, maximum is 16032 
> > blocks
> > 
> > Is this a hard limit?

> Shouldn't be.  How big is the partition you're putting it on?

A little over a terabyte.

One more logdev optimization question: does it make a big
difference to overall filesystem performance whether the logdev
is on a fast disk or a slow disk?

Andrew Klaassen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>