xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS for Linux 1.0.1 Released
From: "Ries van Twisk" <ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:29:18 +0200
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010711135130.032a87d8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3B4C5230.17148.81D3D9@localhost>
Reply-to: ries@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
(We are going a bit off topic here....)
> 
> What distribution is this? If it is debian or SuSE I recomend upgrading 
> your compiler to at least 2.95.3 or 4.
> You can have hung processes or file system corruption when using the older 
> compiler. kgcc is actually a redhat-ism. But it is just gcc 2.91-66 or egcs 
> 1.1.2. If you can get that you are safe.
It's a Debian distro with gg verion 2.95.2, this version always worked for me. 
Is there any real good reason to upgrade to 2.95.3?

> 
> Yes these files have moved. You may be able to specify the location with a 
> --with-acl=/usr/include/acl or something like that. If not, you will have 
> to walk through the code to see where the configure script is looking and 
> change that. I guess the samba folks were probably caught off guard.
> 
I'll see what I can do but this really should go to the samba mailing list.

Ries


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>