Vincent Bernat wrote:
> I am a bit disappointed with LVM status with XFS. The FAQ states only
> LVM 0.7 must work. However, there are here various people using latest
> LVM beta with latest XFS. I have read that LVM status will be fixed
> when the 1.0 will be out. This release will happen in a week or a little
The latest LVM (0.9.1-beta7) is broken (according to Martin) and our
tree is at 0.9.1-beta6 - which works.
> After the release of LVM 1.0, how much time will elapse until an
> "LVM-compliant" XFS be released (as a patch, like current snapshots).
> One week ? Two weeks ? More ?
XFS is "LVM compliant" today, several people are running with it. I
imagine that when LVM 1.0 comes out, we'll do some testing and get it in
our tree without too much delay. But of course that's pure speculation
at this point...