xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks

To: Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 15:57:58 +1200
Cc: rsharpe@xxxxxxxxxx, Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3B50CFF6.4BE90AB0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10107141752080.18419-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B507259.4436853E@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20010715052116.E7056@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B50D058.3090008@xxxxxxxxxx> <3B50CFF6.4BE90AB0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 03:04:22AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:

    They still have cookies, so it is still a braindead protocol.

NFS tries to solve some hard-problems.

IMO, requiring the server be stateless sucks, the client IMO should be
responsible for holding state and reaquiring any resources should it
need to.




  --cw


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>