|To:||Edward Cates <ed@xxxxxxxxxx>, seth.mos@xxxxxxxxx|
|Subject:||Re: XFS + NFS + UMASK|
|From:||Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:55:25 +0200|
CC'ing the list
At 11:29 27-9-2001 -0700, Edward Cates wrote:
I'm running Linxux 2.4.8-xfs with NFS v3 on: dual 1 GHz PIII 2 GB RAM Mylex DAC960 RAID card 5 Seagate Cheetah 73.4 GB hard drives blah blah blah blah blah
And yes, I read the entry in the FAQ, but it said the problem was fixed after 2.4.5, which doesn't seem to be the case.
I believe the actual problem with pre 2.4.5 was that it would occasionally have some NFS problems. Either bad speed or wrong modes. All those fixes went into the 2.4.2 and 2.4.3 kernel that are shipped on XFS 1.0.1 AFAIK.
I think yours is entirely different. The combination of NFS and ACLs is still unknown terrain and has some loopholes. I gather that the umask on the NFS client is correctly set?
Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|