[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface

To: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revised extended attributes interface
From: John Stoffel <stoffel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:01:52 -0500
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Peter J. Braam" <braam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Andreas Gruenbacher <ag@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0112101059020.7362-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
References: <20011210155628.E1919@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.40.0112101059020.7362-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
James>  Hello Stephen ,  Is this the only attribution ?


James>  Just love those 'we won't share security info with you unless
James>  you are member or pay.' .  Sorry , JimL

Excuse me?  This is a paper presented at a conference, not a security
bug report in existing code.  I can totally understand having to pay
for proceedings from a conference.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>