What is the affected version with this? 2.4.17 or all?
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 14:07, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 12:54, Sean Neakums wrote:
> > begin Sean Neakums quotation:
> > > I am now going to do a build of the upstream source and see if I can
> > > make the dump break on that too. I'm hopeful that it will, as the
> > > unexec code is the same in upstream as in the Debian emacs21
> > > package.
> > Yep, I just got me a dumped emacs binary full of NULs with the
> > original GNU source.
> OK, bingo, I can replicate this now, I too have a bad binary, it looks
> like the memory is getting reclaimed without getting flushed out to
> disk - which is not good at all.
> This actually gives me something to go on, hopefully it won't take too
> long to find now. Thanks for your persistance in generating a test
> case here.
> Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511
> Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx
Systems Architect, CCNA
"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Description: This is a digitally signed message part