[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS Inode Size question.

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS Inode Size question.
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:56:38 +0100
Cc: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>, Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1011733555.1279.120.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1011732836.1281.118.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1011733491.2172.18.camel@UberGeek> <1011733555.1279.120.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:05:55PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 15:04, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > Scratch that...it just dropped back down about an hour ago. I wonder why
> > that would be? I mounted a loopback device  around that time. Could that
> > have anything to do with it?
> About the only thing which would shrink it is a memory shortage, one
> of the things this can cause is a shrink of the inode cache.

It's a known problem in 2.4 that it keeps too many dentries/inodes in memory 
around.  It shouldn't keep more inodes than dentries for example, but 
it does after some stress. It's one of the things that didn't get fixed in t
he VM rewrite.  Fortunately it doesn't have too many bad effects except for
some wasted memory and longer lookup times for inodes due to overlong hash 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>