[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS Inode Size question.

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS Inode Size question.
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 22 Jan 2002 17:45:17 -0600
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>, Linux XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020123000648.A16467@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020123000648.A16467@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks much. We now return you to your regularly scheduled mailing

On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 17:06, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:51:46PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > Ok. As a close to this, I'd like to inquire if this will adversely
> > affect a 300GB database running on this machine? 
> > Once the File's have been created, the Inodes are taken already, so I
> > don't see that as being a problem, but if memory consumption is an
> > issue, I wanted to ask so I know if it will become unstable after 30
> > days, 90 days, etc of constant use and data influx.
> I don't think it'll be a problem for database load. 
> -Andi
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>