Also it must be shown that lvm in 2.5 will be worked on, but there was
word from sistna when the released lvm2, that a port would happen at a
later time. I think it's best to ask directly on that list. Probably
even Heinz himself.
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 12:33, Stephen Lord wrote:
> Vernon McPherron wrote:
> > I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately. Does the XFS CVS
> > branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work? I understood
> > that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite different from the 2.4 vfs.
> > I guess this should really go to the Kernel mailing list, just curious
> > to know of those using the 2.5 cvs tree are using LVM & MD.
> > Thanks.
> > -=/Vernon McPherron/=-
> So far as I know, md in 2.5 should be working, lvm is totally broken,
> and no one is attempting
> to fix it. Sistina shows no sign of working on it, they released a
> rewrite of lvm in 2.4 instead.
Systems Architect, CCNA
"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."