xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Announce] XFS 1.1 Prerelease 2 available for testing
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 21 Mar 2002 14:37:44 -0600
Cc: z@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1016741075.30176.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1016741075.30176.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Personally I use gcc 3.0.3 or 3.0.4, I've yet to have things happen
which cannot be explained.

On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 14:04, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 13:50, z@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > | gcc-2.96-101 with good success.  I think that 2.95.x is not so good.
> > 
> >     2.95.x not so good? That's a little scary to me...
> >     could you explain why you feel that way?
> > 
> > | I _really_ hope that some day this question can go away.  :)
> > 
> >     I'll second that...
> 
> xfs exposed some bugs in the 2.95 series, there were reports of 2.95.2
> miscompiling, 2.95.3 may be better...
> 
> -Eric
> 
> -- 
> Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>