[Top] [All Lists]

Re: superblocks and lilo

To: Derek James Witt <djw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: superblocks and lilo
From: Paul Blazejowski <paulb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 27 Mar 2002 00:09:43 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1017149073.5820.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1017092300.2173.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017093184.1748.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017096745.2172.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017114614.1754.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020326155649.C45001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1017149073.5820.26.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 08:24, Derek James Witt wrote:

> Nathan, yeah. I agree.  I have submitted a lilo patch to do just that
> (not allowing itself to install onto a XFS partition). But, it seems
> there are going to be folks not subscribed to the list that may
> unknowingly install lilo in that manner.  

Maybe this patch could be added into the FAQ on oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
site? or perhaps it would be better to submit the patch to author of
LILO? Just a suggestion here...


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>