xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

ACLs (was Re: XFS pressure group)

To: kend@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: ACLs (was Re: XFS pressure group)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:32:39 +1100
Cc: nic@xxxxxxxxxxx, florin@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <32832.10.20.1.46.1017241549.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from kend@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:05:49AM -0500
References: <1017238289.6621.5.camel@pyewacket> <32832.10.20.1.46.1017241549.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:05:49AM -0500, kend@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> ...
> Seriously, though -- first and foremost, I'm an XFS "user", and most
> certainly am not competent to comment in-depth on kernel issues, but I'd
> always been somewhat under the impression that ACLs brought up security
> issues that had yet to be dealt with, and that that was a large portion of
> the reason for Linus' reluctance to include it.  Is this true?

No.

> If so, how has it been addressed?  Or am I merely misguided?

The latter.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>