xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

TAKE - last part of the spinlock irq change

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: TAKE - last part of the spinlock irq change
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:25:54 -0600
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Missed one crucial part. This is a noop on i386, it is not on
plaforms where sizeof(long) != sizeof(int) and the irq mask
uses the extra bits.

This may all be a moot point if some development code pans out,
xfs will have virtually no code in interrupt context if that
works.

Steve

Date:  Fri Mar 29 08:20:57 PST 2002
Workarea:  jen.americas.sgi.com:/src/lord/xfs-linux.2.4

The following file(s) were checked into:
  bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs


Modid:  2.4.x-xfs:slinx:115179a
linux/include/linux/xfs_support/mutex.h - 1.3
        - switch mutex_spinlock to return an unsigned long



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • TAKE - last part of the spinlock irq change, Steve Lord <=