[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Can't get samba 2.2.3a to compile with ACL support (with logs)

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Can't get samba 2.2.3a to compile with ACL support (with logs)
From: Chris Tooley <ctooley@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Apr 2002 12:02:44 -0500
Cc: samba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020420100247.H22886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020418190627.6a4dc65c.cd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3CC05C1D.2080504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020420100247.H22886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I did make the switch in configure from -lacl -lattr and faired no
better results.  I'm using XFS version 1.1 from the 2.4.9-31SGI_XFSsmp

checking if large file support can be enabled... yes
checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in
-lattr... no
checking for ACL support... no
checking whether to build winbind... yes
checking configure summary
configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71265 (%build)

Chris Tooley

On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 19:02, Nathan Scott wrote:
> hello,
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:04:13AM -0700, Anmar Oueja wrote:
> > 
> > We had the same problem. It seems that the new XFS has moved some 
> > functions from the lacl to lattr.
> XFS now uses the ACL userspace code maintained primarily by the good
> folk at acl.bestbits.at, so XFS has not moved any functions anywhere
> (the XFS-specific libacl implementation has in fact ceased to exist).
> These issues we're seeing here are fallout from the switch to the new
> "official" system call interfaces for extended attributes, and some
> library reorganisations that happened at that time.
> > Try and replace the lacl with lattr 
> > and that shoudl solve the issue hopefully.
> You'll need to use both -lacl and -lattr.
> cheers.
> -- 
> Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>