[Top] [All Lists]

Re: performance patches

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: performance patches
From: Paul Schutte <paul@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:09:30 +0200
Cc: Mikes work account <mrock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204260900070.26820-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Is there a good reason for having the logsize=1200b by default ?

I have found that it almost alway causes slowdown under heavy I/O.

Can't we make it 8192b (32Mb) by default.
27968 kb is not much to sacrifice.
It will help people that have no experience with XFS to go fast out of the box.


Eric Sandeen wrote:

> Ah, I stand corrected.  And we're not ignoring that other patch, just
> backlogged!
> Thanks,
> -Eric
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Paul Schutte wrote:
> > That's not what I recommended to him.
> >
> > Here is my mail to him.
> > I don't know what I have break with that patch that I send in and would 
> > rather
> > have SGI guys test is first.
> --
> Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>