[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The mmap() problem is back

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: The mmap() problem is back
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 01:07:31 -0800
In-reply-to: <20020805085806.GC863@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; from wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 10:58:06AM +0200
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020803132927.GA576@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <9862.1028384103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020803142405.GC576@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1028390577.1131.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020803160859.GE576@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1028391174.1131.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020803165941.GF576@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020805085806.GC863@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 10:58:06AM +0200, Wessel Dankers wrote:
> On 2002-08-03 18:59:41+0200, Wessel Dankers wrote:
> > Also of note may be that I'm running it with the ngpt futex patch and the
> > O(1) scheduler patch.
> I just tried a kernel without any patches whatsoever: it exhibits the same
> problem. I did notice that the file needs to be written in small chunks at
> a time. For example:
>       dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024 count=9

i have reproduced this problem quite easily as well with a plain
2.4.19 + split patches on powerpc, its not difficult at all to reproduce.

Ethan Benson

Attachment: pgppFVvt1S8RG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>