[Top] [All Lists]

Re: gcc 3.2

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.2
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:49:04 +0100
Cc: stefano sartini <stefano.sartini@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1030628798.25047.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:46:38AM -0500
References: <3D6E233B.4090209@xxxxxxxxx> <1030628491.25030.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020829144501.A2608@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1030628798.25047.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:46:38AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> > Please don't check it in.  The following patch that went into 2.4.20-pre
> > should fix the root of the problem instead of the symptom:
> Ah, interesting, well, we will leave it as a workaround for folks
> with earlier kernels. It is not as if this is a function we need
> to optimize.

But generic_ffs is not supposed to be used directly.  Applying this fix
to the CVS tree is the much better idea, IMHO.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>