|To:||Michael Best <mbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: Linus merges XFS|
|From:||Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:23:09 +0100|
|In-reply-to:||<3D872A57.email@example.com>; from firstname.lastname@example.org on Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:12:55AM -0600|
|References:||<20020917000532.A18289@s2y4n2c.de> <20020917072301.C81FF69123@xxl.bi.corp.invoca.ch> <3D8723BE.email@example.com> <20020917135954.A25165@infradead.org> <3D872A57.firstname.lastname@example.org>|
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:12:55AM -0600, Michael Best wrote: > Just curious which of their patches/patch combinations were the worst? older xfs + preempt was very bad, merging of wli's unreleases per-zone kswapd + rmap + radix tree code was also very bad. Just look at some of the kernel patches, they're often random patch collections.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|