xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.20pre5aa2

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.20pre5aa2
From: Samuel Flory <sflory@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 12:39:20 -0700
Cc: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>, Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020911184111.GY17868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D81235B.6080809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020913002316.GG11605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1031878070.1236.29.camel@snafu> <20020913005440.GJ11605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D8149F6.9060702@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020913125345.GO11605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3D825422.8000007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020913211844.GP11605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1032014367.1050.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020915131324.A13516@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826


Andi Kleen wrote:

On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 09:39:24AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 16:18, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

So, returning to xfs, it is possible dbench really generates lots of
simultaneous vmaps because of its concurrency, so I would suggest to add
an atomic counter increased at every vmap/vmalloc and decreased at every
vfree and to check it after every increase storing the max value in a
sysctl, to see what's the max concurrency you reach with the vmaps. (you
can also export the counter via the sysctl, to verify for no memleaks
after unmounting xfs)

Andrea
There are no vmaps during normal operation on xfs unless you are
setting extended attributes of more than 4K in size, or you
used some more obscure mkfs options. Only filesystem recovery will
use it otherwise.

Perhaps the original poster used those obscure mkfs options? What option
will trigger huge allocations ?

 I did not use any special options on the filesystem that had the issue.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>