xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

fwd: 1.2pre2 and XFS_VERSION_STRING

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: fwd: 1.2pre2 and XFS_VERSION_STRING
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:59:22 +0100
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
The following mail bounced due to
>   linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     Connection timed out:
>     SMTP timeout while connected to oss.sgi.com [128.167.58.27] after end of
>     data (1803 bytes written):
>     retry timeout exceeded

Are those points still valid in 1.2pre3?
-- 
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- Begin Message ---
To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 1.2pre2 and XFS_VERSION_STRING
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:32:51 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
1.2pre2 sets the version string as if it were pre1:
fs/xfs/linux/xfs_version.h:#define XFS_VERSION_STRING "SGI XFS 1.2pre1"
whereas 1.2pre1 did use the CVS date:
fs/xfs/linux/xfs_version.h:#define XFS_VERSION_STRING "CVS-09/19/02:05"

Personally I very much liked the date format. For instance I wanted to know
whether the "problem with minimal acls on linux"-fix was part of it (it
isn't).

What CVS date is 1.2pre2 based on?
-- 
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpOGZCcgjauB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Attachment: pgpijwmIMv1zg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>