|Subject:||A few questions regarding XFS 1.2|
|From:||Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:22:50 +0100|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003|
Can someone please inform me about something..The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why?
Also, The attr package version is 2.0.11-0 in the installer image but 2.0.12-0 on the ftp site. Again, why? Same name issue exists (attr-devel vs libattr-devel).
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: prcesses stuck in D state (lock_p), Christian Guggenberger|
|Next by Date:||Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Chris Wedgwood|
|Previous by Thread:||Kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:1194, Austin Gonyou|
|Next by Thread:||Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Chris Wedgwood|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|