|To:||Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2|
|From:||Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:56:35 +0100|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003|
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 09:22:50PM +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why?The SGI people have abundant time on their hands but wish to deprive you of the latest code in the installer.
Excellent quoting. If you really mean to quote this part.. look at the filenames.
acl-2.0.19 acl-devel-2.0.19 libacl-2.0.19 vs acl-2.0.19 libacl-2.0.19 libacl-devel-2.0.19 Has absolutely nothing to do with versions. The lower part of my mail did however. // Stefan
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Chris Wedgwood|
|Next by Date:||Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Russell Cattelan|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Chris Wedgwood|
|Next by Thread:||Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Russell Cattelan|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|