|Subject:||Re: XFS in mainline 2.4? (was Re: [PATCH] d_alloc_anon for 2.4.21-pre6)|
|From:||Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:23:34 -0500|
|Cc:||Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|References:||<Pine.LNX.4.53L.0303262107480.2544@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030327165112.A2395@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3E8331CD.3050905@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030327205026.A5650@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02|
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 12:15:57PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:Speaking of XFS, would it be possible to merge it into the 2.4.X mainline any time soon?Talk to Marcelo. If he ever merges the 32bit quota patch I could start to feed him the few remaining XFS core changes, but without that it's not worth to even start.
Marcelo,The 32bit quota backport has been in Alan's -ac series for ages now. I should think it has been thoroughly tested by now. I can't speak for everyone, but for me it operates quite well with XFS. Would it be possible to merge it into mainline anytime soon? If not, what remaining barriers prevent you from doing so?
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: XFS in mainline 2.4? (was Re: [PATCH] d_alloc_anon for 2.4.21-pre6), Christoph Hellwig|
|Next by Date:||[Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch, Alvaro Figueroa|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: XFS in mainline 2.4? (was Re: [PATCH] d_alloc_anon for 2.4.21-pre6), Christoph Hellwig|
|Next by Thread:||[Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch, Alvaro Figueroa|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|