Yes, you'll need more recent attr packages, and also yes, that
dependency should be updated now (its on my todo list).
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 07:57:03PM -0400, Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> I also just noticed that xfsdump-2.2.9-1 depends on the attr package.
> Should it not depend on the libattr1 package, since some of the executables
> are linked against it? Or does something actually call the commands in the
> attr package...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeremy Jackson" <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:07 PM
> Subject: xfsdump debian packages on woody
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to recompile the latest debian xfsdump package (2.2.9-1) on a
> > fresh Debian woody install. I recompile xfsprogs and install first. But
> > it wants libattr1-dev instead of attr-dev (I have stable=2.0.7-1
> > running dpkg-buildpackage with -d lets it build just fine. I notice in
> > 2.2.4-1 you switched the dependency. If I change debian/control from:
> > Build-depends: ... , libattr1-dev, ...
> > to:
> > Build-depends: ..., attr-dev | libattr1-dev, ....
> > it builds without the -d and without complaining.
> > Q: is it just a name change of the -dev package, or is the version
> > Are there any know issues with using xfs 1.2.0 and userspace utilities
> > attr-2.0.7-1?
> > It would be nice if you could add the attr-dev back in, or put in the
> > minimum version required into debian/control, in your next package
> > Regards,
> > Jeremy