xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ACLs on both ext2/ext3 and XFS

To: Andre Majorel <amajorel@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ACLs on both ext2/ext3 and XFS
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:38:24 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030619150026.GA576@xxxxxxxxx>; from amajorel@xxxxxxxxx on Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:00:26PM +0200
References: <20030619150026.GA576@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:00:26PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> What's the wisdom on building a kernel with ACL support for both
> ext2/ext3 and XFS ? I tried applying patches in this order :
> 
>   linux-2.4.20.tar.bz2
>   ea-2.4.20-0.8.58.diff.gz
>   acl-2.4.20-0.8.57.diff.gz
>   nfsacl-2.4.20-0.8.59.diff.gz
>   xfs-2.4.20-split-only.bz2
>   xfs-2.4.20-split-quota32.bz2
>   xfs-2.4.20-split-kernel.bz2
>   xfs-2.4.20-split-misc.bz2
>   xfs-2.4.20-split-acl.bz2
> 
> It goes fine modulo a bunch of "(offset N lines)" messages but as
> soon as I reach xfs-2.4.20-split-acl.bz2, problems appear
> ("Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R?").

The spilt ACL patch should not be needed if you have already
applied Andreas' ACL patches - IIRC, this contains just the
VFS changes to get ACLs functional (which is common between
both patch sets).

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>