xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22

To: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22
From: Florian Schanda <ma1flfs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:38:57 +0000
Cc: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309020832080.12312-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309020832080.12312-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5.3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 02 September 2003 13:33, Mike Burger wrote:
> It's a legal/bureaucratic mess.  The US government has restrictions on the
> export of cryptographical technologies.  If you intend to make something
> available for international consumption, which has crypto capabilities,
> you need to make sure that it meets US federal guidelines or that it's
> approved, otherwise.

Correct me if I'm mistaken,

but isn't it an XFS-patch we're talking about here? The cryptoapi is in the 
vanilla kernel, not the in XFS patch.

        Florian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/VLmWfCf8muQVS4cRAl/YAJ40NRj6+SnsCJCjpbWwKNh5bQKulwCdEWLN
caVdYACLglLggfuZ3/JtC+0=
=CuZx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>