[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20
From: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:47:50 -0500 (EST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309140958220.17784-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I'll check out Axel's RPMs.  If they're created against Red Hat's sources, 
I'll probably be happy.

Luckily for me, I have H+BEDV's AntiVir scanning my system, each night, 
and it detects this type of thing, so I don't think the thing actually got 
installed to where it can do any damage...but I want to be as safe as 

Thanks for looking into moving up the tree.

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Eric Sandeen wrote:

> If you absolutely need this now, I'd suggest Axel's RPMs
> from http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/ - he has the 1.3 patches +
> 2.4.20 already built.
> It would be great if we had the bandwidth to always be up to date
> with Red Hat, but that's not always the case.  I didn't know there were
> serious security issues with -19, so I'll see if we can get -20 done
> sooner than later.
> -Eric
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Mike Burger wrote:
> > If we could see the current XFS merged into the Red Hat 2.4.20-20 sources, 
> > I'd be happy to test them out.
> > 
> > Of course, at the moment, I'd be happy if I knew how the hell the bastard 
> > got into my system, but that's another story.

Mike Burger

Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000

To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to:


with a message of: 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>