I'll check out Axel's RPMs. If they're created against Red Hat's sources,
I'll probably be happy.
Luckily for me, I have H+BEDV's AntiVir scanning my system, each night,
and it detects this type of thing, so I don't think the thing actually got
installed to where it can do any damage...but I want to be as safe as
Thanks for looking into moving up the tree.
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> If you absolutely need this now, I'd suggest Axel's RPMs
> from http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/ - he has the 1.3 patches +
> 2.4.20 already built.
> It would be great if we had the bandwidth to always be up to date
> with Red Hat, but that's not always the case. I didn't know there were
> serious security issues with -19, so I'll see if we can get -20 done
> sooner than later.
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Mike Burger wrote:
> > If we could see the current XFS merged into the Red Hat 2.4.20-20 sources,
> > I'd be happy to test them out.
> > Of course, at the moment, I'd be happy if I knew how the hell the bastard
> > got into my system, but that's another story.
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to:
with a message of: