xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?

To: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?
From: Greg Freemyer <freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 22 Sep 2003 14:03:38 -0400
Cc: Frank Hellmann <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1064248640.1949.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:
References: <3F6EFF6E.9040005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1064248640.1949.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:37, Austin Gonyou wrote:

> I agree that these results are odd. Something is amiss here, but there
> really are many parts to remove before signifying one or the other. You
> could always format that MD volume you made as EXT3 or Reiser and
> perform the same test.
> 
If the filesystem is of no value, you could also do you dd to the raw MD
volume.

If that has similar problems then you can forget about xfs as the
bottleneck. 

Greg
-- 
Greg Freemyer


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>