On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Zeitgeist wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 18:42, Net Llama! wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Martin Spott wrote:
> > On the good news front, a person who wishes to remain anonymous told me
> > that everything should be back on the server within a few days, once SGI's
> > legal dept puts together a statement.
> Why is SGI bending their ass over for these losers?
I can't answer that question, because i don't work for SGI. If i had to
speculate, i'd say its primarily because SGI is alot smaller (and
unfortunately, less stable) of a company than IBM.
> All the other companies just ignore them, like SGI should. We all know
> the company in question is avoiding actually going into the courtroom
> because they have absolutely NO PROOF and just make bogus statements to
> inflate their stock prices because nobody buys their shitty, piss-poor
No argument there.