xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: file corruption

To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: file corruption
From: Leroy van Logchem <leroy.vanlogchem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:23:18 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040402092857.GJ21226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040402001801.GA24900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CB95B.4040500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402011618.GA25511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CC518.1090204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402015022.GA25936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CCF08.9020309@xxxxxxxxxxx> <406CD88F.3070900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402044712.GB27240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406D0AE4.2030203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402085308.GB28623@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402092857.GJ21226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040123
Ethan Benson wrote:

>On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:53:08AM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>  
>
>>>Thanks for clarification, though! :) At least now I know _why_ XFS
>>>shouldn't be used on a production server :)
>>>      
>>>
>>You're most welcome.  Best of luck with reiserfs.
>>    
>>
>if your worried about data corruption/loss, reiserfs is the last fs
>you want to run to...
>
>  
>
Just use UFS2 on FreeBSD and be happy ever after. No corruption no loss 
just production quality.


Been there.... never to return again.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>