Il Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 11:04:03AM +1000, Nathan Scott ha scritto:
> Hi there,
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 07:30:23PM +0200, Kronos wrote:
> > ...
> > It seems that XFS failed an order 5 allocation (not atomic) on the read
> Hmm, that file is fragmented up the wazoo for some reason
> (see the xfs_bmap -vv output on the file). Any chance you
> know how it was written originally?
I think it was written by azureus (bt client), it creates a sparse file
and writes small blocks (usally 256KB) when they are downloaded (in
radom order). The partition had 1GB free (of 10GB) and I run xfs_fsr at
> In particular, was it written with O_SYNC set? (or via a sync NFS
I don't think so, I gave a look at sources it seems using memory mapped
"La mia teoria scientifica preferita e` quella secondo la quale gli
anelli di Saturno sarebbero interamente composti dai bagagli andati
persi nei viaggi aerei." -- Mark Russel