xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Atomicity of xfs_fsr -- also isolation?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Atomicity of xfs_fsr -- also isolation?
From: martin f krafft <madduck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:20:22 +0100
In-reply-to: <87vf8swt4l.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <87ll9obz2e.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050216101917.GA21891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87vf8swt4l.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
also sprach Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2005.02.16.1407 +0100]:
> It's possible to have atomic updates without isolation, at least in
> the database sense of the term (think ACID).  That's why I ask.

... not if they introduce conflicts or cause data loss, though.

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
 
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
"der beruf ist eine schutzwehr, hinter welche man sich erlaubterweise
 zurückziehen kann, wenn bedenken und sorgen allgemeiner art einen
 anfallen."
                                                 - friedrich nietzsche

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>