xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:00:09 -0700
Cc: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050601034202.GA31105@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050531074820.GM8770@xxxxxxxxxxx> <462608.672469a40d5f4a17f7b1f43a4517535a.ANY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050531215402.GE23991@xxxxxxxxxxx> <477395.f3b7fdadc14ce50b8c44d1f319df1ab6.IBX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050601034202.GA31105@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:42:02AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:

> > It is on already on RHEL isn't it?
>
> No. That's the whole point of this exercise ;)

I'm saying I thought RH kernels defaulted to using CONFIG_4KSTACKS
don't they?

> The advantage is no xfs vs xfs.

When I talked (bitched?) to some RH people about the problems with XFS
and 4KSTACKS they claimed that ext3 is faster than XFS is pretty much
any meaningful benchmark on 8-CPU machines or smaller.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>